First Things

Genesis 1:1-5; Mark 1:4-11

January 8, 2005

It still regularly amazes me that the revised common lectionary – the cycle of readings that so much of the Christian church follows each week – so often speaks directly to the concerns that press in on me as I consider the word that God calls me to proclaim to you and with you week to week.

The readings this morning are about first things. Out of the chaos of nothingness, God breathes creation. From the chaos of empire and acculturated religion, God speaks an incarnate word and the ministry of Jesus begins. God breathes. God speaks. Creation responds. First things.

For some time now, I’ve been feeling a need to return to first things, for we cannot move effectively into new things if we fail to understand – or, perhaps better – if we fail to stand under first things, if we fail to be claimed by them and to live our lives under that claim. This is true for how we worship, thus the note in the bulletin this morning about a small change in our order of worship. This is true for how we live our faith in the world as a congregation, and so we will spend time in the coming weeks exploring the theological reasons for the stands we have taken as a community of faith. And this is true for how we live as individuals in the world, and so we will spend time in the coming weeks thinking about questions such as “how does Jesus’ way of living shape my own way of life?”

Why are first things important? We are an extremely rare thing in this world, and anything so rare must be firmly grounded or it will be swept away by tides of fashion and majority opinion. A faith community particularly called to articulate and live out of a progressive theology stands lonely amidst the rising tide of conservative megachurches and fundamentalisms of various stripes. A faith community deeply committed to radical hospitality and inclusive community – particularly with respect to our gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered sisters and brothers – stands all but isolated in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and while we know that there are similar communities elsewhere in the United States, in the global church we are an exile community rejected by the neofundamentalist expression of Christian faith in most of Africa and the conservative Pentecostalism and Roman Catholicism of most of the global south.

We are, indeed, an extremely rare thing in this world, and anything so rare must be firmly grounded or it will be swept away. I do not believe God intends that we be swept away, and I, for one, intend to stand firmly in this place for as long as God gives me voice and calls us together to be the church in this community.

But we do not stand here unopposed, and when we give voice to our commitment to build a progressive, inclusive and diverse community of Christian faith here we can expect to be attacked. Last fall we experienced that in response to our stated policy on weddings, and it continues. Just last week I received another letter calling my faith into question and saying, “If you are a Christian, please do not lead your flock astray. Preach the truth. Preach repentance from sin, not acceptance of it.”

I don’t want to make more of the opposition than it merits, but I don’t want to ignore it altogether either, for, as they say in community organizing circles, opposition is information. For example, several of our critics have taken us to task for stuff they found, or didn’t find, on our web site.

Now, on the one hand, we are clearly not a megachurch with all kinds of resources to throw at a web site so we will probably never have a web presence – or any other kind of presence – that is truly comprehensive and without error. On the other hand, what critics found missing falls clearly under the heading of “first things.”

For example, the stuff about me on the web site is biographical rather than theological. As “theologian in residence” for this community, that should not be so. In response, I am updating my personal statement of faith and we’ll get it posted. You deserve no less and, if we are standing in the public square, the broader community deserves no less either. Likewise, there’s not much on the web site about this faith community’s mission and vision beyond the statement that we print each week on the front of the bulletin. As important and suggestive as that statement is, it is far from thorough. We will work on that as well, drawing on the work of session, the pastor nominating committee that called me and the revisioning work of the congregation prior to the process of calling me here.

Those are relatively simple fixes, but the agitation of opposition has pushed me to wonder about first things at a deeper level, and I have come to the conclusion that we need to reclaim first things at an individual level as well as a corporate level. Indeed, the catch phrase that we use so often – “the church progressive, the church inclusive, the church diverse” – is couched in terms that are political and sociological rather than theological. This choice is considered and, I believe, necessary in an era that does not speak an informed theological language, but we, as the community of faith described with these secular terms, ought to be ready always to describe the deeper theological commitments, values and traditions that we stand under and that lead us to particular expressions of faith be they individual, social or political.

If we fail to attend to first things we risk becoming merely another collective “of a nebulous sort of ‘fellowship,’ or of random activism, or of undifferentiated ‘spirituality,’ or of moralisms old or new, or simply of ‘nice’ people who don’t quite know why [we] are [here] but feel [we] ought to be.”[1]

That will not be enough to sustain us in the days ahead.

If, as the apostle Paul suggests, one of the central ministries of the community of faith is to be stewards of the mysteries of God (1 Cor. 4:1), then we ought to be talking together deeply about these mysteries, about their meaning for our living together as church in and for the world. Only then can we be those people who are able to give an account of the hope that is in us (1 Peter 3:15).

The world is desperate for hope these days. Let us be those people who are ready, willing and able to share good news of very real hope.

This season of focus on first things must not be merely a season of quiet contemplation. “Sages, leave your contemplations,” one of our Christmas carols says. I believe it was Karl Marx who said that the philosophers had done a good job of describing the world, but the point was to change the world. If we, as church, merely describe the condition of world and of our lives in it, then we are failing to live into our calling to be partners with God in the transformation of the world and of our own lives. The good news of the gospel begins with a call to repentance – to transformation.

Now, none of us will ever truly comprehend the mysteries of faith – that’s why we call them mysteries rather than facts, and that’s why we call it faith, not knowledge. Nevertheless, we seek deeper understanding in order that we might more deeply stand under and live out of “first things.”

So, what are these “first things”?

Well, let’s start with our reading from Genesis. It begins with God. Indeed, it says, “In the beginning, God ….” So we begin with a focus on God, and God’s action in history. But, these few verses inform us right off that we do not begin with just any old god, but rather, we begin with a God who creates, a God who brings forth order out of chaos, a God who calls creation good, a God who is active in creation and remains active in history, a God who intends that the order of creation have the character of goodness.

All of this is gift. All of this is grace. Creation does not merit being created. Why is there something rather than nothing? Because God intends it: utterly amazing grace, to begin with.

As an aside that is important in our cultural context, it is crucial to remember that Genesis is a theological text. These are theological claims about the character of God. They are not claims or observations about the processes of creation. This is faith seeking understanding of God, not geology seeking understanding of fossil formation or biology seeking understanding of the origin of species or cosmology seeking understanding of black holes. There are no grounds in Genesis, well and rightly read, for foisting off on the science departments of public schools the teaching of a certain conservative theological world view cloaked under the name of creation science or intelligent design.

Now, that may be a “mere” aside, but it reminds us, in quite contemporary terms, precisely why it is important for us to understand “first things.” First things matter in our lives and in the lives of our children.

It matters that the story we stand under begins with amazing grace. It matters because grace frees us from the constant seeking after God’s approval as if the fate of history – our own very personal history as well as history more broadly understood – as if it were all up to us. None of us can carry that burden, and the God whose story begins with the grace-filled action of creation does not expect us to bear it. Indeed, in both personal and social spheres, if we are honest and if we understand these first things, we realize that “if it is to be … well it better not be just up to me.”

This foundational truth runs profoundly against the grain of the American hyper-individualism that likes to say, “if it is to be it’s up to me.” What a load of garbage – theologically speaking, of course.

From too many pulpits the church has blessed this cultural garbage by focusing on individual sinfulness and individual salvation. For too long. For too long the church has used the language of grace without trusting the grace it pronounces. For too long the church has placed walls of doctrine around its doors and barred entrance to anyone with doubt. For too long the church behaved like a voluntary association of like-minded individuals, thus denying the beauty, wonder and diversity of God’s human creation. These theological errors then leave it up to each individual to proclaim an orthodox confession in order to experience God’s grace – as if our understanding of God could establish limits on God’s action. According to such a theology, orthodoxy itself would calm the chaos and create space for God to act.

That is theological garbage. God does not need the church – in orthodoxy or apostasy – in order to act in the world with grace and mercy, love and justice. Too often, in fact, the church has blocked the way to that grace and mercy, love and justice.

Freed from that load of garbage we can seek the companionship of God and the community of faith to help us bear the loads of living that come the way of each creature – loads of doubt, loads of our own failures, loads of our own sinfulness, loads of loss and grief, loads of suffering injustice. Contrary to contemporary American culture, a truly Biblical ethic is essentially communal. We are in this together, for better and for worse, in times of certainty and those of doubt, in unity and in discord, in sickness and in health. As we become truly the community that God calls forth, then, in companionship with God we can become partners with God in the work of transformation.

Listen carefully to Mark’s word to us, from, as he puts it, “The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.” The beginning of the good news, the gospel, underscores first things. The good news is, again, the radical grace of God. It begins with the incarnation of the transformed human being: Jesus. It begins with the incarnation of radical grace in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. First things.

But the gospel understands the reality of the human condition. It knows us as we are: a broken people living chaotic lives standing in need of grace. So it begins with grace, and it begins with a call to repentance, to turning, to transformation. Grace in the midst of chaos and the call to respond to grace even amidst the chaos. First things.

If we are going to live out of these first things and do so in a manner that reflects God’s particular calling to this community of faith, then we’d best start understanding them, because we are living in progressive, inclusive and diverse Christian community. So, in the weeks ahead, we will look forward by glancing back to first things and first questions: who is God? What is grace? Who is Jesus? What is sin? Who is the Holy Spirit? Others that you suggest. And, with each of these “first things,” how are we to live in light of what we proclaim?

Putting first things first for the church at Clarendon.



[1] Douglas John Hall, Bound and Free (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2005) 13